Long/Short Funds Tend to be more ‘Marketing of Beta’, not ‘Alpha’ Businesses – Jim Chanos
October 15, 2014 Leave a comment
Straight from the Horse’s mouth (i.e. Jim Chanos):
I view macro and short selling as skill-based or alpha businesses, whereas equity long/short hedge funds tend to be more of a “marketing of beta” business. I am always amazed that investors will pay 2 and 20 for a manager that is always net long.
I have been saying that for 20 years. It is interesting because I run an alpha-based business and I am more sensitive to it than others. I sit on investment committees and I see it as an investor who advises these funds. When I ask why a lot of hedge fund compensation is simply embedded market risk, I get very uncomfortable, squirming, dodgy answers. Or no answers at all.
Look at 2013. It is crazy to see managers who were up 15 percent command huge checks, when the S&P was up 30 percent. Particularly since they were not balanced completely. They were 90 percent long and 30 percent short, or something like that. Not much alpha has been created by hedge funds, and
what was created has been taken by fees. This has been the case for a long time. In a way, short sellers might still be one of your great bargains out there, at 1 and 20 percent of the alpha. That is the closest I will get to a marketing pitch.
source: Steve Drobny, The New House of Money
A good friend of mine agrees. In his own words, “people confuse brains with a bull market.”